Why Understanding IM Cost Structure Matters
Injection molding is the most cost-effective process for producing plastic parts at scale - but only if you understand the cost structure. A part that costs $0.15 each at 100,000 units can cost $150 each at 10 units, because tooling dominates the economics at low volume. This guide breaks down every cost component so you can make informed make-vs-buy and mold-vs-print decisions.
The Four Cost Components
Every injection-molded part's landed cost consists of four buckets. Understanding each is essential for accurate quoting.
Injection molding is the most cost-effective process for producing plastic parts at scale - but only if you understand the cost structure. A part that costs $0.15 each at 100,000 units can cost $150 each at 10 units, because tooling dominates the economics at low volume. This guide breaks down every cost component so you can make informed make-vs-buy and mold-vs-print decisions.
Tooling (NRE)
The mold itself - design, machining, texturing, and qualification. This is the single largest upfront investment.
Material
Resin cost per part, determined by part weight and resin price per pound.
Production
Machine time, labor, secondary operations, and quality inspection.
Overhead
Mold maintenance, storage, engineering changes, and logistics.
Pro Tip
At low volumes (<1,000 parts), tooling dominates total cost. At high volumes (>100,000), material and cycle time dominate. Know which phase you're in to optimize the right lever.
Tooling Costs: The Biggest Line Item
Mold cost is the single largest upfront investment in injection molding. It varies by 50× depending on part complexity, steel grade, number of cavities, and geography.
| Mold Class | SPI Classification | Steel | Expected Life | Cost Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prototype (soft tooling) | Class 105 | Aluminum 7075 or P20 pre-hard | 500–5,000 shots | $2,000–$10,000 |
| Low-volume production | Class 104 | P20 pre-hardened steel | 10,000–100,000 shots | $8,000–$30,000 |
| Mid-volume production | Class 103 | H13 or S7 hardened steel | 100,000–500,000 shots | $25,000–$75,000 |
| High-volume production | Class 102/101 | H13 hardened, chrome-plated | 500,000–1,000,000+ shots | $50,000–$200,000+ |
Undercuts and side actions
Each side-pull or lifter adds $2,000–$8,000 to the mold. A simple open-and-shut mold (no side actions) is generally the most cost-effective option.
Multi-cavity layouts
A 4-cavity mold costs ~2.5× a single-cavity mold, but produces 4× the parts per cycle - it pays for itself above ~50,000 units.
Tight tolerances
Holding ±0.001″ on a molded feature requires tighter mold steel tolerances (±0.0005″), which means EDM finishing and longer polish time.
Texturing
Chemical etch textures (MT series) add $500–$3,000 depending on area and depth. Laser texturing for finer patterns costs more.
Hot runners
A hot runner system ($5,000–$15,000) eliminates the cold runner sprue, saving 10–30% material and reducing cycle time - justified above ~25,000 parts.
Pro Tip
Don't buy a Class 101 mold for 10,000 lifetime parts. A $5,000 aluminum prototype mold will serve you fine - and you can transition to steel later if volumes ramp.
Material (Resin) Costs
Material cost per part = (part weight + runner weight) × resin price per gram. Runner weight is recyclable with a granulator (regrind), but typically limited to 15–25% regrind ratio for structural parts.
| Resin | Price ($/lb) | Density (g/cm³) | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABS | $1.00–1.50 | 1.04 | Consumer electronics, housings, toys |
| Polypropylene (PP) | $0.60–1.00 | 0.90 | Packaging, living hinges, containers |
| Nylon 6/6 (PA66) | $1.50–3.00 | 1.14 | Structural clips, gears, under-hood auto |
| Polycarbonate (PC) | $1.80–3.00 | 1.20 | Lenses, transparent housings, medical |
| PC/ABS blend | $2.00–3.50 | 1.10 | Laptop housings, automotive interior |
| POM (Delrin/acetal) | $1.50–2.50 | 1.41 | Gears, clips, precision mechanical |
| Glass-filled nylon (PA66-GF30) | $2.00–4.00 | 1.35 | High-stiffness structural, brackets |
| PEEK | $50–80 | 1.30 | Aerospace, medical, semiconductor |
Example: A 25-gram ABS housing with a 5-gram cold runner. • Total shot weight: 30 g (0.066 lb) • ABS price: $1.25/lb • Material cost per shot: $0.083 • With 20% regrind: effective cost ~$0.070/part Material cost is usually 10–30% of total part cost at production volumes. It becomes a larger share for high-volume commodity parts (where mold cost is fully amortized) and a smaller share for low-volume specialty parts.
Pro Tip
Buying resin in bulk (pallet quantities, 2,000+ lb) typically saves 10–20% vs. small-lot pricing. Always negotiate at volume.
Production Costs (Machine + Labor)
Machine rate is quoted per hour and depends on press tonnage (which is determined by projected area and packing pressure).
| Press Size (tons) | Hourly Rate | Typical Part Size |
|---|---|---|
| 50–100 tons | $40–60/hr | Small connectors, clips, knobs |
| 100–300 tons | $60–100/hr | Housings, covers, brackets |
| 300–500 tons | $100–150/hr | Large enclosures, panels |
| 500–1,000 tons | $150–250/hr | Automotive bumpers, large bezels |
Cycle time (injection + cooling + ejection) directly determines throughput. A 30-second cycle on a $80/hr press produces 120 parts/hour at $0.67/part machine cost. Cut cycle time to 20 seconds and that drops to $0.44/part - a 34% reduction. The primary lever for cycle time is cooling time, which is driven by the thickest wall section. Every 0.5 mm of excess wall thickness adds ~5–10 seconds of cooling. This is why DFM rule #7 (uniform wall thickness) matters so much for molded parts.
Pro Tip
Cycle time is the hidden lever. Every 0.5 mm of excess wall thickness adds ~5–10 seconds of cooling. Uniform wall thickness is the single best DFM optimization for injection molding.
Total Cost Per Part at Different Volumes
Real example: a 30-gram ABS consumer electronics housing, 120 mm × 80 mm × 25 mm, with two side actions and MT-11010 texture on the A-surface.
| Volume | Mold Type | Mold Cost | Part Cost | Amortized Mold/Part | Total $/Part |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | Aluminum prototype | $5,000 | $2.50 | $50.00 | $52.50 |
| 1,000 | Aluminum prototype | $5,000 | $1.80 | $5.00 | $6.80 |
| 10,000 | P20 steel (Class 104) | $18,000 | $0.95 | $1.80 | $2.75 |
| 50,000 | H13 steel (Class 103) | $35,000 | $0.70 | $0.70 | $1.40 |
| 250,000 | H13 4-cavity (Class 102) | $85,000 | $0.45 | $0.34 | $0.79 |
| 1,000,000 | H13 8-cavity (Class 101) | $150,000 | $0.30 | $0.15 | $0.45 |
The inflection point where injection molding becomes cheaper than CNC machining or 3D printing a similar ABS part is typically 500–2,000 units for simple geometries and 2,000–5,000 units for parts with side actions or tight tolerances.
Pro Tip
The inflection point where injection molding becomes cheaper than CNC or 3D printing is typically 500–2,000 units for simple geometries and 2,000–5,000 units for parts with side actions.
Ten Ways to Reduce Injection Molding Costs
Split into design-phase and production-phase strategies - the earlier you optimize, the bigger the cost impact.
ADesign Optimizations
Eliminate undercuts
Redesign snap-fits, hooks, and internal features so the mold opens in a straight pull. Each side action saved removes $3,000–$8,000 from the mold.
Maintain uniform wall thickness
Target 1.5–2.5 mm for most resins. Core out thick sections. Every extra 0.5 mm adds ~5–10 seconds of cycle time.
Use generous draft
1–2° minimum on all vertical walls. More draft = faster ejection = shorter cycle.
Consolidate parts
If two parts snap together and are always assembled, consider molding them as one. You eliminate a mold, an assembly step, and an inventory SKU.
Use standard textures
MT-11000 series textures are stocked patterns - custom textures cost 2–3× more and have longer lead times.
BProduction Optimizations
Right-size the mold steel
Don't buy a Class 101 mold for 10,000 lifetime parts. A $5,000 aluminum prototype mold will serve you fine - and you can transition to steel later if volumes ramp.
Increase cavities at the right time
Moving from 1 to 2 cavities costs ~60% more for the mold but doubles output - amortized cost per part drops ~20% above 25,000 units.
Use hot runners for high volume
The $8,000–$15,000 hot-runner investment eliminates runner waste (10–30% material savings) and cuts cycle time by 2–5 seconds.
Negotiate resin pricing
Buying resin in bulk (pallet quantities, 2,000+ lb) typically saves 10–20% vs. small-lot pricing.
Optimize gate location
A well-placed gate fills the part uniformly, reduces weld lines, and eliminates cosmetic defects that require secondary operations (buffing, painting).
Pro Tip
The most impactful cost optimizations happen in the design phase. Wall thickness, undercut elimination, and draft angles are locked before tooling starts - get them right early.
When to Use IM vs. Alternatives
Injection molding isn't always the answer. This table shows when alternatives (3D printing, CNC, urethane casting) are more cost-effective.
| Volume | Best Process | Typical Per-Part Cost |
|---|---|---|
| 1–10 parts | 3D printing (FDM/SLS) or CNC machining | $15–$150 |
| 10–100 parts | CNC machining or urethane casting | $10–$80 |
| 100–1,000 parts | Prototype injection molding (aluminum tool) | $5–$50 |
| 1,000–10,000 parts | Production injection molding (P20 tool) | $1–$10 |
| 10,000+ parts | Production injection molding (H13 multi-cavity) | $0.30–$3 |
Bridge tooling strategy: For product launches with uncertain demand, start with an aluminum prototype mold ($3,000–$8,000). Produce the first 1,000–5,000 units to validate the market. If demand materializes, invest in production steel tooling with the revenue from initial sales.
Pro Tip
Use bridge tooling: start with a $3K–$8K aluminum mold for the first 1,000–5,000 units, then invest in steel tooling only after demand is proven.
Conclusion
Injection molding cost optimization starts in the design phase. The most impactful decisions - wall thickness, undercut elimination, mold steel class, and cavity count - are all determined before a single part is produced. Get these right and you'll have a cost structure that scales.
For programs with uncertain volume, use the bridge tooling strategy: aluminum prototype mold first, steel production mold when demand is proven. This de-risks the tooling investment while keeping your per-part cost competitive.
Low Volume (100–1K)
Use a $2K–$10K aluminum tool (Class 105) for market validation and early production. Per-part cost is higher ($5–$50) but total investment is low.
Mid Volume (1K–50K)
Invest in production steel ($18K–$75K) once demand is proven. Per-part cost drops to $1–$3 and the mold lasts 100K–500K shots.
High Volume (50K+)
Multi-cavity hardened steel ($50K–$200K+) delivers per-part costs under $1. Hot runners and optimized cycle time maximize ROI.
For programs with uncertain volume, use bridge tooling: aluminum prototype mold first, steel production mold when demand is proven. This de-risks tooling investment while keeping per-part cost competitive.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does an injection mold cost?
What is the cost per part for injection molding?
At what volume does injection molding become cost-effective?
How can I reduce injection molding costs?
What are the hidden costs in injection molding?
Should I use aluminum or steel tooling?
Ready to Manufacture Your Parts?
Upload your CAD file and get a quote in hours. We offer both CNC machining and 3D printing with engineer-reviewed DFM feedback.
Get Free Quote Fast